Monday, August 27, 2018

MindLab Blog Week 19 – Community of Practice:


A Community of Practice (CoP) is described by (Lave 1991), as ‘a process of social learning that occurs when people who have a common interest in a subject or area that collaborate over an extended period of time, sharing ideas and strategies, determined solutions and build innovations’. CoP require three components a domain, community and practice.   

My CoP is for both inquiry topics which is our Social Studies department comprising of 12 teachers that teach from years 9-13. We meet every Monday afternoon and participate in the school wide action plan Kia Eke Panaku to accelerate Maori learners and Interlead as an appraisal system. As a department we are working towards inquiry as a key focus. Which is all about increasing student’s motivation, engagement and developing self-management skills. As a CoP team we decided that digital tools would enhance student achievement through engagement and collaboration with others. Our CoP is split into year levels to focus more on student agency, engagement and enquiry. Collaboratively the smaller focussed groups share their expertise and knowledge. These interactions consist of face to face or online. Our shared practice allows us to make deeper connections, develop ongoing support, and share learning experiences or expertise to deal with problems as they arise.   

Our shared domain is the teaching of the students in the classroom environment.

Our community is the group of teachers who make up this community of practice.

Our practice is defined by the curriculum levels as well as the teaching and learning.

Using Jay and Johnson’s (2002) reflective model I will briefly reflect and describe two potential teacher inquiry topics and how these relate to my community of practice.

My first possible inquiry topic is to develop 21st century learning skills through the intergration of social studies by using authentic context, tools and rubrics from ITL Research.

Students are learning to understand that 21st century skills can improve student engagement through the use of a variety of tools. Using relevant contexts focusing on the development of 21st century skills by providing a rich learning environment which will motivate, encourage and stimulate all learners to want to learn.  

My second possible inquiry topic is what impact can a blended classroom have on student engagement and achievement?

Students are learning to develop the skills to learn that through participation and motivation result in meaningful learning outcomes. The use of devices, current research along with guided facilitation from the teacher students will experience a deeper understanding of the content. Creating authentic learning experiences along the way.  

Both inquiry topics relate to my CoP through peer and group collaboration work which allows for student inquiry and ownership to take place. Other teachers in the same curriculum can share the learning platform alongside you through the use of a device. The main purpose is for students to become lifelong learners developing the following skills:

·       Collaboration through participation
·       Problem solve to achieve a common goal
·       Sharing of ideas and resources
·       Motivated wanting to learn more
·       Engaged with the content
·       Use of prior knowledge skills
·       Builds confidence through active engagement
·       Set students up for success
·       Promotes ownership and develops inquiry

Upon critical reflection I have discovered that being part of a community of practice has had positive outcomes in terms of learning and support. The importance to collaborate and share ideas to reach a common goal in order for students to progress and become successful is vital.  As Cambridge, Kaplan, and Suter (2005) suggest ‘that communities of practice provide an environment for people to connect, interact, build and extend the shared resources within shared learning goals’.  

References:

ITL Research. (2012). 21CLD Learning Activity Rubrics. Retrieved from https://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research


Jay, J.K. and Johnson, K.L. (2002) Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.

Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on socially shared cognition2, 63-82.

Ministry of Education, New Zealand Curriculum online. The Capabilities for Living and lifelong learning, Accessed on 10.8.18, Retrieved from


Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Retrieved from 

Monday, August 13, 2018

MindLab Blog Week 18 - Future-oriented Learning and Teaching:


MindLab Blog Week 18 - Future-oriented Learning and Teaching:
MindLab has certainly challenged me in many areas of my teaching practice. There have been many positive changes that I have implemented due to the knowledge gained and the tools that have assisted me to make the necessary changes. I’ve critically reflected on my teaching and learning pedagogy and evaluated the impacts it has had on the students. I will use Gibbs’ reflective cycle to support me with this blog. The theme from ‘Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching - a New Zealand perspective’ that I am reflecting on is personalising learning (Bolstad, Gilbert, McDowall, Bull, Boyd, & Hipkins, 2012).
Description:
This term I made a conscious decision to make a deliberate shift in my teaching practice to personalise learning more that incorporates the development of 21st century skills. This was a mammoth task as I had to rethink the role of the teacher and that of the student. This change initiative came about a new skill learn’t which was to really value and listen to student voice more intently. In doing so inspired me to make a significant change in my teaching pedagogy by allowing a particular class I teach decide what they wanted to learn and how. As Lindgren & McDaniel (2012) point out, “people are more driven to achieve the agendas they set for themselves.”
Feelings:
I felt like I had let these students down this year by allowing curriculum content and policies dictate what I must teach. End of term I felt disheartened because majority of the class had disengaged with the content and didn’t pass assessments. Going forward the plan was to get students to choose what subjects they wanted to learn about. I was overwhelmed with an assortment of feelings how this was going to pan out. (The unknown) The major shift in my practice was one that Bolstad, Gilbert, McDowall, Bull, Boyd & Hipkins (2012) describe as “being built around the learner rather than the learner conforming to the system.”
Evaluation:
Students thrived being part of the decision making process and the learning became more personal, relevant developing necessary skills. Students felt in control and took ownership from start to finish giving 100% engagement and participation. The changes made dramatically enhanced self-confidence and promoted self-esteem. Truly awesome teaching experience to be a part of and learn alongside my students. Certainly exceeded my expectations seeing all diverse and special needs learners succeed.
Analysis:
As Bolstad, Gilbert, McDowall, Bull, Boyd & Hipkins (2012) states “structuring roles and relationships in ways that draw on the strengths and knowledge of each other in order to best support the learning,” also supports the idea of when there is a balance of teacher and student led learning allows for all students to use their strengths becoming the best learners they can be.
Conclusion:
The main challenge I will face is to keep the momentum going for the rest of the year from support from colleagues. I cannot anticipate what problems may arise or what students needs are but we can work together to meet those needs. Allowing students to become 21st-century learners could solve various problems on their own. Bishop and Berryman (2009) states, “improved student engagement comes from recognizing and valuing students.” This initiative has provided great opportunities for me to gain a better understanding of how the students think, learn and feel about the learning process.
Action Plan:
I need to aim for a paradigm shift in thinking to be knowledgeable and keep up with current readings, research and literature in education. To believe that I am the best advocate for my students by listening to their needs and backing myself more.  
References
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching — a New Zealand perspective. Report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.education counts.govt.nz/publications/schooling/109306
Finlay, L. (2009). Reflecting on reflective practice. PBPL. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/opencetl/sites/www.open.ac.uk.opencetl/files/flies/ecms/web-content/Finlay-(2008)-Reflecting-on-reflectivepractice-PBPL-paper-52.pdf
ITL Research. (2012). 21CLD Learning Activity Rubrics. Retrieved from http://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research

Lindgren, R., & McDaniel, R. (2012). Transforming Online Learning through Narrative and Student Agency. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 344-355.
Price, M. V., & Savicki, V. (2017). Components of Reflection: A Longitudinal Analysis of Study Abroad Student Blog Posts. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 29(2). 51-62. Retrieved from
http://web.b.ebscohost.com.libproxy.unitec.ac.nz/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=f3251423-d15b-4a12-aabd-3191c49f6c55%40sessionmgr120

Thursday, August 9, 2018

Mindlab Blog Week 17 My Reflective Practice


Teacher  reflection becomes part of a process that we learn to adapt and change over time or in different situations. Throughout my own teaching practice and before participating in Mindlab I assumed my reflecting was meaningful and relevant because it was done regularly. Since reading the article on Finlay (2009) I realised that if the lesson was going well according to myself then I tended not to deeply reflect or question myself further thinking the lesson was a success. However if a lesson was monotonous I was able to think and make an instant change. Therefore thinking my evaluating and reflecting was complete. I really didn’t think about my role in this process deeply or analytically that being a critically reflective practitioner takes time, effort and skills to develop further which builds over time. In light of current research and specifically looking at the model of Zeichner and Liston (1996) as Finlay explores, I am now able to connect on a deeper level understanding how the 5 different levels can relate to my teaching practice now and in the future. At first this process seemed so daunting as I have never blogged before and as for scrutinising my reflective practice made me feel anxious and quite vulnerable. I looked at how Zeichner and Liston’s (1996) model fitted with what I was already doing which empowered me to want to do more. Reflecting on what I could do better in the future this is what I came up with…..

Rapid Reflection:
Currently I give students feedback about their learning. I identify when students find tasks challenging and take action automatically what is needed. In the future I need to give more specific written feedback or feed forward  to students. I will also rapidly reflect on the entire lesson. The point as Finlay (2008, p.1) put it is to “recapture practice experiences and mull them over critically in order to gain new understandings and so improve future practice.”

Repair:
I respond to students needs for whatever reason. I can alter my teaching midway based on students cues. For the future I will use higher order questioning and collaborate more with students discussing their learning to enhance their cultural toolkit, developing the inquiry process. Ghaye (2000) states that it is important for people to collaborate and problem solve in reflective conversations with each other. 

Review
I’m always reviewing and thinking about my teaching pedagogy. I discuss with colleagues aspects about teaching but not enough utilising their expertise. McKay (2008, Forthcoming) says: there are “compelling reasons” to do reflection in collaboration with others. This process has inspired me to develop my written reflections for future planning and share these more with colleagues and students. As L arrivee (2000) recommends that keeping a reflective journal is a way to ensure time is set aside for deep and regular reflection.

Research:
Current research and readings are done because of staff professional development or needed as specific aspects arose. Now i’m actively researching and wanting to provide rich, authentic learning experiences for my students. Backing myself as to what current research suggests. It is cruticual that reflective practice be cultivated and fostered to become effective. It can be a “powerful tool to examine and transform practice” (Finlay, 2008 p.10).

Retheorizing and Reformulating:
I examine my own teaching practice regularly. However this is definitely one area that I will consciously develop by critically examining my own practice and theories in light of more relevant research. Larrivee (2000) summaries nicely that “critical reflection is not only a way of approaching teaching - it is a way of life.”

References:
Finlay, L. (2009). Reflecting on reflective practice. Practice-based Professional Learning Centre, Open University. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/opencetl/sites/www.open.ac.uk.opencetl/files/files/ecms/web-content/Finlay-(2008)-Reflecting-on-reflective-practice-PBPL-paper-52.pdf
Jay, J.K. and Johnson, K.L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.
Larrivee, B. (2000).Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293-307.
Zeichner, K. M. and Liston, D.P. (1996) Reflective Teaching: An Introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.